Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 9-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12763156 |
| Dimir Midrange | rpa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Jeskai Convoke | nessin | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Jeskai Oculus | pretender88 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Dimir Bounce | kanister | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Affinity , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Cage , Azorius Convoke , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Midrange , Azorius Tokens Control
Meta Performance Analysis
Spyglass Siren ranks #24 out of approximately 310 cards in raw efficiency (top 8%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 52.8%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Spyglass Siren is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 36.73 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 71.3%. Spyglass Siren has a win rate of 73.5%, making it 3.0% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 31 | 75.8% | 11 |
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 25 | 75.6% | 15 |
| Norn's Inquisitor | Creature — Phyrexian Knight | 5 | 70.0% | 3 |
| Assimilation Aegis | Artifact — Equipment | 12 | 69.4% | 5 |
| Scorching Dragonfire | Instant | 39 | 67.1% | 14 |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 22 | 64.9% | 8 |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 64 | 64.8% | 14 |
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 67 | 64.3% | 11 |
| Kiora, the Rising Tide | Legendary Creature — Merfolk Noble | 38 | 64.2% | 16 |
| Ajani, Caller of the Pride | Legendary Planeswalker — Ajani | 67 | 63.8% | 10 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Spyglass Siren than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shardmage's Rescue | Enchantment — Aura | 1 | 5 | 87.5% | 76.5% | +11.0% |
| Blot Out | Instant | 3 | 7 | 81.0% | 73.3% | +7.6% |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 22 | 76.4% | 71.2% | +5.2% |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 1 | 17 | 76.7% | 72.0% | +4.7% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 17 | 73.8% | 70.3% | +3.5% |
| Bounce Off | Instant | 1 | 5 | 83.3% | 79.8% | +3.5% |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 14 | 76.9% | 73.6% | +3.3% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 91 | 74.8% | 71.6% | +3.1% |
| Fear of Isolation | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 2 | 88 | 74.5% | 71.5% | +3.0% |
| Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 1 | 88 | 74.5% | 71.6% | +2.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 1906 | 94.1% | 50.8% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 542 | 98.0% | 48.6% |
| Dimir Bounce | 429 | 89.0% | 49.8% |
| Azorius Flash | 218 | 98.2% | 58.5% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 185 | 75.8% | 48.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.